Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a hyperglycaemic emergency requiring insulin administration, hydration, electrolyte replacement and treatment of the underlying precipitant. Insulin administration is highly protocolised with either variable rate intravenous infusion (insulin rate titrated based on glucose level) or fixed rate intravenous infusion (insulin rate is constant with glucose titrated). International guidelines recommend fixed rate insulin infusions.1,2 However the limited evidence comparing these two modalities suggests variable and fixed rate insulin infusions result in similar time to resolution of DKA.3-5
Aim: To characterise DKA management protocols used in Australian hospitals.
Methods: An online survey of Australian endocrinologist and intensive care physicians between May and July 2024.
Results: A summary of DKA protocols from 30 hospitals around Australia were collected. There was wide variation including fixed (n=12), variable (n=14) and combination (n=5) insulin infusion protocols (Table 1). Of those that used fixed or combination protocols, one had a fixed starting insulin rate that was independent of patient weight (4 units/hour); the remaining protocols determined rate based on units/kg, most commonly 0.1 units/kg or 0.05 units/kg. Most (77%) respondents had worked at another hospital that had a different DKA management protocol. There was a 50% split (n=14 each) in personal preference for fixed or variable rate infusion with 4 respondents not having a preference.
Most (68%) protocols defined resolution of DKA, most commonly based on pH level (71%) and/or ketone level (86%). A pH of >7.3 was the most common (83%) threshold for resolution. The ketone threshold for DKA resolution varied: 14% (n=2) used <1.0 mmol/L, 79% (n=11) used <0.6 mmol/L, and 7% (n=1) used <0.3 mmol/L.
Conclusion: There is substantial variation in insulin regimens and criteria for resolution in DKA management protocols across Australian hospitals, and clinician preference was diverse. This likely reflects the lack of high-quality evidence to guide practice.